Workflow

The pre-auth was not denied. It was returned for missing conservative-care documentation, three weeks after you needed it.

Interventional pain authorizations fail on missing history, not on medical judgement. Capture prior injections, failed conservative treatment, imaging, and plan identifiers while the patient is on the phone, and hand your billing team a packet with the gaps already marked.

Insurance identifiers captured at intake: plan, member ID, group number, and whether an authorization is already in progress
The history a packet needs: prior injections or ablations and their dates, what conservative treatment was tried and for how long, and what imaging exists
Patient-reported answers are recorded as the patient gave them, with the source noted, so your team knows what still needs a record pulled
Missing items are flagged explicitly, so an incomplete packet is visible before submission rather than after a payer returns it
Everything arrives as one structured summary for your billing team to attach to the request
Which procedures and which plans keep generating requests for more documentation becomes visible over time, because the same fields are captured every time

How it pays back

The gap is found in the call, not in the return letter

Most delays in pain authorization are not disagreements about the procedure. They are a missing date, an undocumented course of physical therapy, or imaging that was never attached. Asking for those items while the patient is on the line collapses a three-week round trip into a question.

Patient-reported is labeled as patient-reported

A patient's recollection of when they had their last injection is a lead, not a record. The summary records what the patient said and marks what needs to be confirmed from a report or an outside system, so nobody submits a packet built on memory.

Your billing team stops chasing callbacks

The work of ringing a patient back for a member ID or the name of the physical therapy clinic is the least valuable thing an authorization specialist does. When those fields arrive with the referral, their day moves to appeals, denial work, and the payer relationships that actually need a person.

Patients hear the process, not a prediction

Callers are told what your practice does next and who follows up. Coverage, approval odds, and turnaround are not asserted on the call, because a promise that does not hold turns one authorization question into a week of them.

Insurance intake structured upfront

Member ID, group number, prior authorizations, and eligibility captured on first call

Clinical history documented

Prior procedures, failed conservative treatment, imaging results, and pain severity recorded

Pre-auth packages complete

Billing team receives all required documentation without follow-up calls

Insurer requirements flagged

AI notes which payers commonly request imaging, appeals, or additional clinical notes

Frequently asked questions

Which fields belong in a pain procedure authorization packet?

Your billing team defines the list, and it is captured the same way on every call. In most pain practices it includes the plan and member identifiers, the specific procedure and level or site, prior injections or ablations with dates and response, documented conservative treatment and its duration, and the relevant imaging.

How far back should prior injection history be asked about?

Your team sets the lookback, and it is asked consistently rather than left to whoever takes the call. Repeat-procedure history matters more in pain than in most specialties because the request usually concerns a procedure the patient has had before, and the dates and response to those earlier injections are what the packet is built around.

The patient does not know their member ID. Then what?

Name, date of birth, and the insurer or employer are captured, the patient is asked to check their card, and the missing identifier is flagged for staff follow-up before submission rather than discovered at the point of filing.

How is prior conservative treatment captured?

By asking directly what was tried, when, for how long, and what the result was, covering the items your practice lists such as physical therapy, medication trials, and prior injections. The answers are recorded as reported and flagged where a supporting record has to be retrieved.

What is the caller told while the request is pending?

Your published next step and who will follow up. No coverage determination is stated in either direction, no out-of-pocket figure is quoted, and no turnaround is predicted. Submission, clinical justification, and any appeal remain with your billing and clinical teams.